Codebook: Trust in AI Commerce Report, Edition 2

This codebook documents the public dataset for Edition 2 of the Trust in AI Commerce Report, fielded August 27 to September 1, 2026. It lists every published column with its question wording, response options, scale anchors and the respondents who saw it. With this page and the dataset, a reader can reproduce the report’s figures except the open-text coding and the most- and least-trusted assistant grid (see Data notes).

Edition 1 (published June 2026) has its own codebook and dataset. The two files use different column sets and are not interchangeable.


Study summary

FieldValue
Field windowAugust 27 to September 1, 2026
Survey platformAlchemer
Sample panelGeneral-population panel, U.S. adults 18 and over
Total records collected2,624
Disqualified at screen760
Partial completions371
Complete responses (rows in the dataset)1,493
Median completion time7.2 minutes
WeightingNone; panel quotas balanced age, gender and region
LanguageEnglish (U.S.)
LicenseCC BY 4.0

For the full methodology, see the Methodology section of the report.


File structure

The dataset is a UTF-8 CSV with 1,493 rows and 135 columns. Each row is one complete response. Disqualified and partial records are not included, so no filter is needed to reach the analysis basis.

Columns removed or recoded before publication

The raw survey export has 152 columns. Before release, every column’s values were profiled, and columns that could identify a person, a device or a session were removed. Open-text answers were removed because a respondent could be identified by what they wrote.

Raw export columnTreatmentReason
Response IDReplaced by respondent_idPlatform record number; links back to the raw export
Time StartedRemovedTimestamp to the second identifies a session
Date SubmittedRecoded to the calendar dateThe date shows the field window; the time of day is removed
SessionID, RIDRemovedSession and panel respondent identifiers
User AgentRemovedBrowser and device identifier
IP Address, Latitude, Longitude, City, Postal, CountryRemovedNetwork and location identifiers
State/RegionRecoded to RegionPublished only as Census region, the level the report uses
11a. “Verified” meaning (open text)RemovedOpen text; coded shares are in report §9.1 and representative answers are below
29. Trust or mistrust an AI assistant (open text)RemovedOpen text; coded shares are in report §3.3
“Other” write-in text at Q7, Q25, Q39 and Q52RemovedFree text; the “Other” selection columns are kept
CompleteRemovedEmpty platform field

How to read this codebook

Column headers are the question wording as exported from the survey platform, including the question number (for example 12. Have you used an AI assistant…). Question numbers follow the instrument. Gaps in the numbering are instrument items that do not appear as columns in the raw export.

  • Matrix questions (grids) have one column per row of the grid. The header is the row label, a colon, then the question. The cell holds the answer chosen for that row.
  • Multi-select questions have one column per option. The header is the option, a colon, then the question. The cell holds the option label when selected and is blank otherwise.
  • Blank cells in a single-select or grid column mean the question was not shown to that respondent (see Universe), or, for a handful of cells, that it was skipped.
  • Characters are exported as typed in the instrument, including curly apostrophes and the mixed dashes in the age bands (18–24, 25–34 use an en dash; 35-44 and older use a hyphen).

Bases

The report uses four bases. Each can be rebuilt from two columns.

BasenHow to select it in the CSV
Full sample1,493All rows
Trend base: online shoppers1,2472. Where do you make your purchases… is not “I shop only in physical stores” (246 rows excluded)
AI users55012. Have you used an AI assistant… = Yes
AI users on the trend base517Both of the above

Every comparison with Edition 1 uses the trend base, because Edition 1 screened out store-only shoppers. The AI-user blocks (Q13 onward, except Q22 to Q24) were shown only to AI users, so they are blank for the other 943 rows.

Routed sub-bases used in the report: verifiers are AI users with Q13 = “Yes - always” or “Yes - sometimes” (493); error-finders are verifiers whose Q17 answer is not “Never” (443); completers are AI users with Q44 = Yes (119); the located subsample is the 1,008 rows with a Region.


Scale encoding: map the worded anchors before averaging

The survey platform exports most rating scales as a mix of words and numbers: the anchor points carry their label and the points between them carry a number. A mean computed on the numbers alone silently drops every anchor answer. Map each label to its scale point first. Every mean in the report was computed this way.

1-7 grids and scales: anchors at 1, 4 and 7

QuestionsExported as 147Exported as numbers
Q9 category research confidence (18 columns)Not at all confidentNeutralVery confident2, 3, 5, 6
Q11 source trust (7 columns), Q22 AI trust by category (18 columns)Do not trust at allNeutralTrust completely2, 3, 5, 6
Q24 review trustNot at all confidentNeutralExtremely confident2, 3, 5, 6

0-10 items: anchors at 0, 5 and 10

QuestionExported as 0510Exported as numbers
Q5 last-purchase confidenceNot at all confidentNeutralExtremely confident1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9
Q10 retailer statement0510All values export as numbers 0 to 10. The instrument labels 0 “Completely disagree” and 10 “Completely agree”.

Fully worded 1-7 scales

These export every point as words. Map them in this order, 1 to 7.

Question1234567
Q33 believed accuracy (3 columns)Completely InaccurateMostly InaccurateSomewhat InaccurateNeutralSomewhat AccurateMostly AccurateCompletely Accurate
Q34 “AI shopping answers are unbiased”Completely disagreeDisagreeSomewhat DisagreeNeutralSomewhat AgreeAgreeStrongly Agree
Q42 monthly-allowance comfortVery UncomfortableUncomfortableSomewhat UncomfortableNeutralSomewhat ComfortableComfortableVery Comfortable

Remap in Python

ANCHORS_1_7 = {"Not at all confident": 1, "Do not trust at all": 1, "Neutral": 4,
               "Very confident": 7, "Trust completely": 7, "Extremely confident": 7}
ANCHORS_0_10 = {"Not at all confident": 0, "Neutral": 5, "Extremely confident": 10}

def to_num(value, anchors):
    value = value.strip()
    if value == "":
        return None
    return anchors[value] if value in anchors else float(value)

Apply ANCHORS_1_7 to the Q9, Q11, Q22 and Q24 columns and ANCHORS_0_10 to Q5. For Q33, Q34 and Q42, map each label to its position in the tables above.


Anchor statistics

These are the report’s headline figures, each recomputed from this CSV. A replication that matches them has the bases and the scale mapping right.

StatisticValueComputed as
Used AI to research a purchase, past 90 days41.5%Q12 = Yes ÷ trend base (517 of 1,247)
Same, full sample36.8%Q12 = Yes ÷ all rows (550 of 1,493)
Verified the AI recommendation before buying89.9%Q13 = “Yes - always” or “Yes - sometimes” ÷ AI users on the trend base (465 of 517)
Always verify41.0%Q13 = “Yes - always” ÷ AI users on the trend base
Would spend under $25 on an AI pick without checking42.2%Q23 = “Under $25” ÷ trend base
Have let an AI assistant complete a purchase21.6%Q44 = Yes ÷ AI users (119 of 550)
Would let an agent spend nothing unsupervised37.5%Q37 = “Nothing” ÷ AI users
Would not give an agent a payment method43.1%Q38 = No ÷ AI users
AI tool or assistant, mean trust (1-7)4.12Q11 “AI tool / assistant” column, anchors mapped, trend base (n=1,247); 3.98 on all 1,493 rows
Last-purchase confidence (0-10)7.03Q5, anchors mapped to 0, 5 and 10, trend base, non-blank (n=1,243)
Retailer trust mean (0-10)6.40Q10, trend base
Net Retailer Trust Score−23.7Q10: share answering 9 or 10 minus share answering 0 to 6, trend base
Review trust (1-7)4.56Q24, anchors mapped, trend base
Category research confidence, 18-category mean (1-7)4.95mean of the 18 Q9 column means, anchors mapped, trend base
Trust in AI recommendations, 18-category mean (1-7)4.01mean of the 18 Q22 column means, anchors mapped, trend base

Variables

A. Administrative

ColumnNameTypeNotes
1respondent_idInteger1 to 1,493, unique per row. Assigned for this release in order of submission. It does not match any platform or panel identifier.
2StatusCategoricalComplete on every row.
3Date SubmittedDate (YYYY-MM-DD)Day the response was submitted, 2026-08-27: 24, 2026-08-28: 573, 2026-08-29: 268, 2026-08-30: 8, 2026-08-31: 599, 2026-09-01: 21.

B. Age (Q1)

Column 4: 1. What is your age?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: Respondents under 18 were screened out. 45-54 corrects Edition 1’s overlapping “44-54” label.
ResponseCount
18–24153
25–34234
35-44269
45-54238
55-64271
65 or older328

C. Shopping mode (Q2)

Column 5: 2. Where do you make your purchases when you shop for products?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: Defines the trend base: rows other than “I shop only in physical stores”. Edition 1 screened store-only shoppers out; Edition 2 kept them as a segment (246).
ResponseCount
I shop only online170
Mostly online, some in physical stores365
50/50 online and physical stores712
I shop only in physical stores246

D. Categories purchased, past 12 months (Q3)

Question: “Which of the following have you purchased for yourself or your household in the past 12 months? (Select all that apply)”

  • Type: Multi-select; the cell holds the option label when selected, blank otherwise
  • Universe: All respondents
ColumnOptionSelected
6Apparel (shoes, clothing, accessories)1,141
7Electronics (smart phone, computer, tablet)661
8Video games (gaming console, games)389
9Skincare (lotion, supplements, sunscreen)815
10Beauty (makeup, cosmetics)492
11Baby products/child safety (stroller, car seat, baby gate)149
12Supplements/health products (vitamins, protein powder, first aid kit)645
13Kitchen appliances (air fryer, blender, coffee maker)413
14Mattress/bedding (mattress, pillows, bed sheets)351
15Fitness equipment (dumbbells, yoga mat, treadmill)246
16Home improvement tools (drill, ladder, power saw)428
17Pet products (dog bed, crate, automatic feeder)611
18Furniture (desk, chair, bookshelf)239
19Fashion/clothing (jacket, jeans, handbag)535
20Grocery/food delivery (Instacart order, meal kit, restaurant delivery)907
21Outdoor/camping gear (tent, sleeping bag, cooler)171
22Automotive accessories (car seat cover, dash cam, phone mount)263
23Toys/games (LEGO set, board game, remote-control car)321

E. Category of the most recent $50+ online purchase (Q4)

Column 24: 4. Think about the last time you bought a product online that cost $50 or more. From which category was that purchase?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,489 non-blank)
  • Notes: Not applicable (214) includes 100 store-only shoppers.
ResponseCount
Apparel (shoes, clothing, accessories)426
Electronics (smart phone, computer, tablet)231
Video games (gaming console, games)89
Skincare (lotion, supplements, sunscreen)46
Beauty (makeup, cosmetics)27
Baby products/child safety (stroller, car seat, baby gate)20
Supplements/health products (vitamins, protein powder, first aid kit)33
Kitchen appliances (air fryer, blender, coffee maker)53
Mattress/bedding (mattress, pillows, bed sheets)34
Fitness equipment (dumbbells, yoga mat, treadmill)19
Home improvement tools (drill, ladder, power saw)41
Pet products (dog bed, crate, automatic feeder)48
Furniture (desk, chair, bookshelf)12
Fashion/clothing (jacket, jeans, handbag)26
Grocery/food delivery (Instacart order, meal kit, restaurant delivery)121
Outdoor/camping gear (tent, sleeping bag, cooler)5
Automotive accessories (car seat cover, dash cam, phone mount)17
Toys/games (LEGO set, board game, remote-control car)27
Not applicable214
(blank)4

F. Last-purchase confidence, 0-10 (Q5)

Column 25: 5. For that purchase, how confident were you that you found the best product for your needs before completing the purchase?

  • Type: 0-10 scale, anchors exported as words
  • Universe: All respondents (1,487 non-blank)
  • Notes: Map Not at all confident = 0, Neutral = 5, Extremely confident = 10. Trend-base mean 7.03 (n=1,243).
ResponseCount
Not at all confident41
131
244
393
468
Neutral229
689
7135
8228
9177
Extremely confident352
(blank)6

G. Sources used to research that purchase (Q7)

Question: “Which of the following did you use to research that purchase? (Select all that apply)”

  • Type: Multi-select; the cell holds the option label when selected, blank otherwise
  • Universe: All respondents
  • Notes: The “Other” write-in text is not published.
ColumnOptionSelected
26I did not do research387
27AI assistant (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity)225
28Online customer reviews575
29Reddit or online forums152
30YouTube videos or reviewers295
31Friends or family390
32Expert publications or professionals93
33Brand or retailer website385
34Other46

H. Category research confidence, PRCI (Q9)

Question: “In general, how confident are you in your ability to find the best product when shopping online in each of the following categories?”

  • Type: Grid, one column per row
  • Response set: Not at all confident, 2, 3, Neutral, 5, 6, Very confident (1 to 7)
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 per column)
ColumnRow labelNon-blank
35Apparel (shoes, clothing, accessories)1,493
36Electronics (smart phone, computer, tablet)1,493
37Video games (gaming console, games)1,493
38Skincare (lotion, supplements, sunscreen)1,493
39Beauty (makeup, cosmetics)1,493
40Baby products/child safety (stroller, car seat, baby gate)1,493
41Supplements/health products (vitamins, protein powder, first aid kit)1,493
42Kitchen appliances (air fryer, blender, coffee maker)1,493
43Mattress/bedding (mattress, pillows, bed sheets)1,493
44Fitness equipment (dumbbells, yoga mat, treadmill)1,493
45Home improvement tools (drill, ladder, power saw)1,493
46Pet products (dog bed, crate, automatic feeder)1,493
47Furniture (desk, chair, bookshelf)1,493
48Fashion/clothing (jacket, jeans, handbag)1,493
49Grocery/food delivery (Instacart order, meal kit, restaurant delivery)1,493
50Outdoor/camping gear (tent, sleeping bag, cooler)1,493
51Automotive accessories (car seat cover, dash cam, phone mount)1,493
52Toys/games (LEGO set, board game, remote-control car)1,493

I. Retailer statement, 0-10 (Q10)

Column 53: 10. How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement: 'Online retailers always have my best interest as a customer in mind.'

  • Type: 0-10 scale, exported as numbers
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: 0 = “Completely disagree”, 10 = “Completely agree”. Net Retailer Trust Score = share answering 9 or 10 minus share answering 0 to 6.
ResponseCount
045
132
281
3102
4124
5253
6143
7181
8178
9108
10246

J. Source trust hierarchy (Q11)

Question: “When researching a product you may buy online, how much do you trust information from each of the following sources?”

  • Type: Grid, one column per row
  • Response set: Do not trust at all, 2, 3, Neutral, 5, 6, Trust completely (1 to 7)
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 per column)
ColumnRow labelNon-blank
54AI tool / assistant1,493
55Online customer reviews1,493
56Reddit or online forums1,493
57YouTube creators or reviewers1,493
58Friends or family1,493
59Expert publications or professionals1,493
60Brand or retailer website1,493

K. What “verified” means (Q11a, open text)

Every respondent was asked: “When a shopping site or an AI assistant says a product claim is ‘verified,’ what do you think that actually means?” The answers are not published (see File structure). Report §9.1 gives the coded shares. Representative answers, quoted as typed, one for each theme:

Theme in report §9.1Representative answer
Someone independently checked or tested it“That the product claim has been tested by an independent party and seen as legitimate.”
Do not know, or no clear meaning“I am not sure what that means, I never heard of this”
It is authentic, legit, not a scam“I think verified means the item is authentic or real”
The claim is true or accurate“It should mean that the claim has been checked and found to be true. I’m not entirely sure it’s applied that way”
It is safe, good quality, works as promised“That the product has been checked out and tested and it is safe to buy”
Real customers wrote the reviews“It has been reviewed by a real customer and not an influencer”
Distrusts the label, or AI in general“No idea if it was verified, I don’t trust it.”
It was asserted by the seller, or is marketing“I think is just marketing, can be true or not”

L. Trust in AI recommendations by category (Q22)

Question: “How much do you trust AI-generated product recommendations in each of the following categories?”

  • Type: Grid, one column per row
  • Response set: Do not trust at all, 2, 3, Neutral, 5, 6, Trust completely (1 to 7)
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 per column)
  • Notes: Asked before the AI-use question so it stays comparable with Edition 1 and can be cut by AI use.
ColumnRow labelNon-blank
61Apparel (shoes, clothing, accessories)1,493
62Electronics (smart phone, computer, tablet)1,493
63Video games (gaming console, games)1,493
64Skincare (lotion, supplements, sunscreen)1,493
65Beauty (makeup, cosmetics)1,493
66Baby products/child safety (stroller, car seat, baby gate)1,493
67Supplements/health products (vitamins, protein powder, first aid kit)1,493
68Kitchen appliances (air fryer, blender, coffee maker)1,493
69Mattress/bedding (mattress, pillows, bed sheets)1,493
70Fitness equipment (dumbbells, yoga mat, treadmill)1,493
71Home improvement tools (drill, ladder, power saw)1,493
72Pet products (dog bed, crate, automatic feeder)1,493
73Furniture (desk, chair, bookshelf)1,493
74Fashion/clothing (jacket, jeans, handbag)1,493
75Grocery/food delivery (Instacart order, meal kit, restaurant delivery)1,493
76Outdoor/camping gear (tent, sleeping bag, cooler)1,493
77Automotive accessories (car seat cover, dash cam, phone mount)1,493
78Toys/games (LEGO set, board game, remote-control car)1,493

M. Most you would spend on an AI pick without checking (Q23)

Column 79: 23. What is the most you would spend on a product recommended by an AI assistant without checking any other source first?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: Asked of everyone, before the AI-use question.
ResponseCount
Under $25688
$25–$50299
$51–$100222
$101–$250136
$251–$50079
Over $50069

N. Review trust (Q24)

Column 80: 24. How confident are you that online product reviews accurately reflect product quality?

  • Type: 1-7 scale, anchors exported as words
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: Map Not at all confident = 1, Neutral = 4, Extremely confident = 7.
ResponseCount
Not at all confident125
268
3140
Neutral416
5381
6199
Extremely confident164

O. AI use for product research, past 90 days (Q12)

Column 81: 12. Have you used an AI assistant to help research a product you were considering buying in the past 90 days?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: The gate for every AI-user block. Yes = 550 (517 on the trend base).
ResponseCount
Yes550
No943

P. Verified the AI recommendation (Q13)

Column 82: 13. Did you verify the AI assistant’s recommendation through another source before making a purchase?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Yes - always222
Yes - sometimes271
No57
(blank)943

Q. First place checked (Q14)

Column 83: 14. The last time you double-checked an AI assistant’s recommendation, where did you look first?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users who verify (495 non-blank)
  • Notes: Non-blank for the 493 verifiers and 2 respondents who answered No at Q13. The report’s base is the 493 verifiers.
ResponseCount
Online customer reviews181
A search engine108
The brand’s or retailer’s own website69
Friends or family66
Another AI assistant28
YouTube or video reviews23
An expert publication9
Somewhere else5
I do not double check AI assistant’s recommendations6
(blank)998

R. How often checking found the AI wrong (Q17)

Column 84: 17. How often has checking shown you that the AI’s answer was wrong or out of date?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users who verify (495 non-blank)
  • Notes: Non-blank for the same 495 rows as Q14. The report’s base is the 493 verifiers.
ResponseCount
Never52
Rarely140
Sometimes194
Often72
Every time37
(blank)998

S. What you did after finding the AI wrong (Q18)

Column 85: 18. The last time you found the AI’s answer was wrong, what did you do next?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
  • Notes: Shown to all AI users. The report’s §2.5 base is the 443 error-finders.
ResponseCount
Decided not to buy at all133
Bought a different product113
Bought it anyway89
Stopped using AI for that kind of shopping60
Nothing in particular116
I do not double check AI assistant’s recommendations39
(blank)943

T. Did the AI save you money (Q19)

Column 86: 19. Thinking about your most recent AI-assisted purchase — do you believe the AI saved you money?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Yes308
No121
Not sure121
(blank)943

U. Did it find the best available price (Q20)

Column 87: 20. Do you believe it found you the best available price?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Yes375
No78
Not sure97
(blank)943

V. Assistants used for product research, past 90 days (Q25)

Question: “Which AI assistants have you used to research a product in the past 90 days? (Select all that apply)”

  • Type: Multi-select; the cell holds the option label when selected, blank otherwise
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes)
  • Notes: The write-in text is not published. Grok and Meta AI recurred among the write-ins (report §3.1). The most- and least-trusted assistant grid in report §3.2 is not in the raw export and is not in this file.
ColumnOptionSelected
88ChatGPT330
89Google Gemini349
90Claude97
91Perplexity62
92Microsoft Copilot123
93Amazon’s shopping assistant151
94Walmart’s shopping assistant124
95Other - Write In10
96Not applicable14

W. Noticed a sponsored recommendation in an AI answer (Q30)

Column 97: 30. Have you ever noticed a sponsored or paid recommendation inside an AI assistant’s answer?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Yes228
No213
Not sure109
(blank)943

X. Trust if a recommendation is clearly labeled sponsored (Q31)

Column 98: 31. If an AI assistant clearly labelled a recommendation as sponsored, how would that change your trust in it?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Trust it much more40
Trust it more108
No change183
Somewhat less128
Trust it much less91
(blank)943

Y. Trust if a paid recommendation was not disclosed (Q32)

Column 99: 32. And if you found out afterwards that a recommendation had been paid for, without being told, how would that change your trust?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
  • Notes: Disclosure Premium = share answering “Somewhat less” or “Trust it much less” at Q32 minus the same share at Q31 (277 of 550 minus 219 of 550, or 10.5 points).
ResponseCount
Trust it much more36
Trust it more71
No change166
Somewhat less134
Trust it much less143
(blank)943

Z. Believed accuracy of AI shopping answers (Q33)

Question: “How accurate do you think AI shopping answers usually are about each of these?”

  • Type: Grid, one column per row
  • Response set: Completely Inaccurate, Mostly Inaccurate, Somewhat Inaccurate, Neutral, Somewhat Accurate, Mostly Accurate, Completely Accurate (1 to 7)
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 per column)
ColumnRow labelNon-blank
100Price550
101Product specifications and features550
102Whether something is in stock or still sold550

AA. “AI shopping answers are unbiased” (Q34)

Column 103: 34. How much do you agree with the statement “AI shopping answers are unbiased — not influenced by advertisers or brands.”

  • Type: 1-7 scale, every point worded
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Completely disagree20
Disagree49
Somewhat Disagree73
Neutral140
Somewhat Agree120
Agree81
Strongly Agree67
(blank)943

AB. Knew an AI answer can repeat brand marketing (Q35)

Column 104: 35. Before today, did you know an AI answer can repeat a brand’s own marketing claims as if they were facts?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Yes, I knew200
I suspected213
I did not know137
(blank)943

AC. Agent tasks allowed without asking first (Q36)

Question: “Would you let an AI shopping agent do each of these without asking you first?”

  • Type: Grid, one column per row
  • Response set: Yes - without asking, Yes - only if it asks first, No, never
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 per column)
ColumnRow labelNon-blank
105Research products550
106Track prices550
107Add things to a cart550
108Apply a promo code550
109Place an order550
110Reorder something you buy regularly550
111Return an item550

AD. Most an agent should spend without checking (Q37)

Column 112: 37. What is the most an AI agent should be able to spend without checking with you?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Nothing206
Under $25129
$25–$100149
$100–$50055
More than $50011
(blank)943

AE. Give an agent a payment method (Q38)

Column 113: 38. Would you give an AI agent access to a payment method?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Yes109
Yes, with limits204
No237
(blank)943

AF. What holds you back (Q39)

Question: “What holds you back? (Select all that apply)”

  • Type: Multi-select; the cell holds the option label when selected, blank otherwise
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes)
  • Notes: The write-in text is not published.
ColumnOptionSelected
114I want control over what it buys338
115I do not trust the company that built it138
116I do not trust the shops it would buy from131
117Fraud or security worries289
118It might make expensive mistakes200
119Other - Write In11

AG. Who is at fault if an agent buys the wrong thing (Q41)

Column 120: 41. If an AI agent bought the wrong thing with your money, who would be most at fault?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Me252
The company that built the agent246
The shop31
The payment provider21
(blank)943

AH. Comfort with a monthly agent allowance (Q42)

Column 121: 42. Suppose you could give an AI agent a set monthly amount to spend on your behalf. How comfortable would you be doing that?

  • Type: 1-7 scale, every point worded
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Very Uncomfortable140
Uncomfortable78
Somewhat Uncomfortable82
Neutral95
Somewhat Comfortable73
Comfortable46
Very Comfortable36
(blank)943

AI. Let an AI assistant complete a purchase (Q44)

Column 122: 44. Have you ever let an AI assistant complete a purchase for you, start to finish?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
  • Notes: Completers are Q44 = Yes (119).
ResponseCount
Yes119
No - I got to checkout but paid myself153
No - I started one but stopped before paying96
I never let an AI assistant complete a purchase for me182
(blank)943

AJ. Assistant that completed the purchase (Q45)

Question: “Which assistant did you let complete a purchase for you?”

  • Type: Multi-select; the cell holds the option label when selected, blank otherwise
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes), routed on Q44
  • Notes: 124 rows have a selection: 118 of the 119 completers and 6 who answered No at Q44. The report’s shares use the 119 completers (Q44 = Yes).
ColumnOptionSelected
123ChatGPT73
124Google Gemini60
125Claude20
126Perplexity7
127Microsoft Copilot14
128Amazon’s shopping assistant18
129Walmart’s shopping assistant17

AK. Already used AI for holiday shopping (Q48)

Column 130: 48. Have you already used an AI assistant for any holiday shopping this year?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Yes201
No319
I do not really do holiday shopping30
(blank)943

AL. Expect to use AI for holiday shopping this season (Q49)

Column 131: 49. Do you expect to use an AI assistant for holiday shopping this season?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: AI users (Q12 = Yes) (550 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Definitely152
Probably241
Probably not108
Definitely not49
(blank)943

AM. Gender (Q50)

Column 132: 50. What is your gender?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Female749
Male744

AN. Household income (Q51)

Column 133: 51. What is your annual household income before taxes?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: The report groups these into four bands: under $30,000; $30,000-$59,999; $60,000-$100,000; over $100,000.
ResponseCount
Less than $30K512
$30-$39K186
$40-$59K243
$60-$74K160
$75-$100K163
$100-$150K159
$150,000 and over70

AO. Ethnicity (Q52)

Column 134: 52. What is your ethnicity?

  • Type: Single-select
  • Universe: All respondents (1,493 non-blank)
  • Notes: The “Other” write-in text is not published.
ResponseCount
White (non-Hispanic)870
Hispanic or Latino272
Black or African American186
Asian or Pacific Islander106
Other59

AP. Census region

Column 135: Region

  • Type: Derived
  • Derivation: Census region (Northeast, Midwest, South, West) of the U.S. state the survey platform assigned by passive geolocation. Blank when the respondent could not be located in the United States.
  • Universe: All respondents (1,008 non-blank)
ResponseCount
Northeast213
Midwest199
South422
West174
(blank, not located)485

Data notes

  • Open text. The Q11a and Q29 answers and the “Other” write-ins are withheld to protect respondents. The coded shares in report §3.3 and §9.1 cannot be recomputed from this file.
  • Most- and least-trusted assistants. Report §3.2 comes from the survey platform’s standard report. That grid is not in the raw export; it will be added to the dataset if supplied.
  • Weighting. The data are unweighted, as is the report.
  • Location. 98.9% of completes geolocated to the United States. Region is published for the 1,008 respondents located to a U.S. state.

Citation

Product.ai Research. The Trust in AI Commerce Report, Edition 2 [Data set]. Product.ai, 2026. https://product.ai/research/trust-in-ai-commerce-report/. License: CC BY 4.0.